Article 349 of Indian Constitution: Special procedure for enactment of certain laws relating to language

Last Updated on May 27, 2025
Download As PDF
IMPORTANT LINKS
Parts of the Indian Constitution
Part 11 of the Indian Constitution
Part 1 of the Indian Constitution Part 2 of the Indian Constitution Part 3 of the Indian Constitution Part 4 of the Indian Constitution Part 4 A of the Indian Constitution Part 5 of the Indian Constitution Part 6 of the Indian Constitution Part 8 of the Indian Constitution Part 9 of the Indian Constitution Part 9A of the Indian Constitution Part 10 of the Indian Constitution Part 12 of the Indian Constitution Part 13 of the Indian Constitution Part 14 of the Indian Constitution Part 14A of the Indian Constitution Part 15 of the Indian Constitution Part 16 of the Indian Constitution Part 17 of the Indian Constitution Part 18 of the Indian Constitution Part 19 of the Indian Constitution Part 20 of the Indian Constitution Part 21 of the Indian Constitution Part 22 of the Indian Constitution

Under part 17, Article 349 of Indian Constitution was enacted to safeguard India’s linguistic harmony during the formative years of the Republic . With the transition from colonial administration to self-governance, language became a sensitive subject. The Constitution-makers recognized that adopting an official language would require careful steps to avoid alienating non-Hindi-speaking populations.

Thus, Article 349 of Constitution of India was introduced to control how laws concerning official language use were made during the early years. It limited the power of Parliament in this regard, emphasizing a consultative process involving expert committees .

This provision placed under the language-related framework of the Constitution, reflects the careful planning done to maintain administrative efficiency and national unity . By enforcing a special approval process for language legislation for the first 15 years, Article 349 of the Indian Constitution played a crucial role in ensuring that no abrupt or politically driven decisions would disturb the country’s diverse linguistic fabric . Explore in-depth analysis of other Constitutional Articles.

Overview

Name of the Article

Article 349 of Indian Constitution- Special procedure for enactment of certain laws relating to language

Part of the Constitutional Article

XVII

Article 349 of Indian Constitution

Special procedure for enactment of certain laws relating to language

During the period of fifteen years from the commencement of this Constitution, no Bill or amendment making provision for the language to be used for any of the purposes mentioned in clause (1) of article 348 shall be introduced or moved in either House of Parliament without the previous sanction of the President, and the President shall not give his sanction to the introduction of any such Bill or the moving of any such amendment except after he has taken into consideration the recommendations of the Commission constituted under clause (1) of article 344 and the report of the Committee constituted under clause (4) of that article.

Note: "The information provided above has been sourced from the official website, i.e., Indian Code. While the content has been presented here for reference, no modifications have been made to the original laws and orders"

Free Download PDF on Article 349 of Indian Constitution

- pehlivanlokantalari.com
📚 Exclusive Free Judiciary Notes For Law Aspirants
Subjects PDF Link
Download the Free Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita PDF Created by legal experts Download Link
Grab the Free Law of Contract PDF used by Judiciary Aspirants Download Link
Get your hands on the most trusted Free Law of Torts PDF Download Link
Crack concepts with this Free Jurisprudence PDF crafted by top mentors Download Link
Crack Judicial Services Exam with India's Super Teachers

Get 18+ 12 Months SuperCoaching @ just

₹149999 ₹55999

Your Total Savings ₹94000
Explore SuperCoaching

Article 349 of Indian Constitution Simplified Interpretation 

To put Article 349 of the Indian Constitution in simple words: it laid down a special process for introducing language-related laws during the first 15 years after the Constitution began.

It specified that no bill or amendment related to the use of language for court rulings, laws, or parliamentary business—under Article 348(1)—could be introduced in Parliament without the prior approval of the President. But this approval wasn’t automatic. The President had to first consider the advice and recommendations of the Official Language Commission set up under Article 344(1), as well as a committee formed under Article 344(4), before giving the green light.

Key Highlights of Article 349:

The key highlights relating to article 349 is given below -

  • Special Procedure : Introduces a stricter framework for language-related laws during India’s transitional phase .
  • Time-Bound : This provision applied for the first 15 years after the Constitution’s commencement .
  • Presidential Approval: Parliament could not act alone; the President’s sanction was compulsory.
  • Consultation Mandate: The President needed to evaluate inputs from expert bodies before allowing language-related legislation.
  • Objective: To maintain unity and avoid conflict by taking a balanced, informed approach to the sensitive matter of language policy.

This shows how art 349 promoted national integration without overriding regional languages.

Article 349 of Indian Constitution Landmark Cases

Upon examining court archives and legal commentaries, there are no landmark Supreme Court cases that directly deal with Article 349 of Indian Constitution. This absence is likely due to the article’s temporary nature and its smooth, procedural implementation during the 15-year window.

Most legal discussions involving language in the Constitution reference Articles 343, 344, and 348, while 349 article served primarily as a procedural filter rather than a litigated issue. Nonetheless, its influence remains part of India’s broader legal framework for managing linguistic diversity.

Article 349 of Indian Constitution Significance

Article 349 of Constitution of India played an essential role in protecting the country’s unity during a crucial transitional period . The framers knew that rushing into language decisions could inflame regional tensions especially in a country as multilingual as India.

By requiring the President’s prior approval—and mandating consultation with language commissions and parliamentary committees—Article 349 slowed down the legislative process regarding official languages. This cautious and structured approach gave time for consensus-building.

Moreover, the article safeguarded the rights of non-Hindi speakers showing that national policy wouldn’t be shaped by the majority alone . It reflected a democratic ethos where expert advice guided sensitive decisions . For 15 years, this clause ensured that any changes to language laws were informed, deliberate and inclusive.

In short, the significance of Article 349 of Indian Constitution lies not in long-term lawmaking but in its short-term impact on building trust and unity among India's linguistic communities.

Article 349 of Indian Constitution Developments and Amendments

Article 349 was crafted as a temporary safeguard, active only for the first fifteen years after the Constitution came into force in 1950. That means it remained applicable until 1965. Its objective was fulfilled as India developed its official language policy and established structured linguistic commissions during this time.

After the period expired, the procedure laid out in article 349 no longer applied. Parliament could then pass language-related laws without needing prior presidential sanction or consulting language commissions. Since it was a transitional provision, there have been no amendments to Article 349 of Constitution.

However, India’s language policy did evolve through other mechanisms. The adoption of the Official Languages Act (1963) and continued use of English alongside Hindi in official communication were informed by the cautious approach encouraged by art 349.

Thus, while the article itself has not been amended or extended, it set a precedent for how language issues should be handled—with care, consultation, and respect for India’s linguistic diversity. Its successful implementation helped avoid political conflict and shaped India’s modern language administration structure.

Conclusion

Article 349 of Indian Constitution stands out as a protective mechanism ensuring that India's language policy evolved gradually and responsibly. During the first 15 years post-independence, the country faced the challenge of choosing an official language amidst its rich linguistic diversity.

This article served as a constitutional checkpoint. By mandating the President’s prior sanction for introducing language-related bills—along with input from the language commission and parliamentary committee—it prevented impulsive decisions in this sensitive area. It promoted thoughtful policymaking that reflected the voices of various communities.

Even though 349 article is no longer active, its influence continues in how language issues are approached today. It showed that the Indian Constitution is not just a legal text but a thoughtful document that prioritized social harmony and inclusive governance.

In a country where language can easily become a political issue, Article 349 of the Indian Constitution set a tone of balance and consultation. It fulfilled its purpose and left behind a valuable legacy of respect for diversity, cautious progress, and unity through consensus.

More Articles for Constitutional Articles

Article 349 of Indian Constitution : FAQs

Article 349 of Indian Constitution sets a special rule for passing language-related laws in Parliament during the first 15 years after the Constitution began.

Its purpose was to slow down language policy changes and ensure they were made only after expert review and presidential approval.

They deal with the use of English in courts and laws. Article 348 outlines language use, while Article 349 controls changes to it for 15 years.

Yes. During the first 15 years, no bill on language under Article 348(1) could be introduced without the President’s consent.

The President must consider reports from the Language Commission (Article 344(1)) and a parliamentary committee (Article 344(4)).

No. It was only valid for 15 years after the Constitution began in 1950. It expired in 1965.

It protected linguistic harmony by stopping sudden changes to official language use in courts and legislation.

No. Since it was a temporary article, it has never been amended or legally challenged in major court rulings.

Report An Error