Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

All Cadbury are Nestle.

No Nestle is Amul.

Some Cadbury are Britannia.

Conclusions:

I. Some Nestle are Britannia.

II. No Amul is a Cadbury

III .No Amul is Britannia.

Statements:

All Cadbury are Nestle.

No Nestle is Amul.

Some Cadbury are Britannia.

Conclusions:

I. Some Nestle are Britannia → Follow → Since 'All Cadbury are Nestle' & 'Some Cadbury are Britannia.' means that Britannia is a subset of Nestle so the conclusion follows.

II. No Amul is a Cadbury → Follow → Since 'All Cadbury are Nestle' & 'No Nestle is Amul..' means that 'No Cadbury is Amul.' and vice versa so the conclusion follows.

III .No Amul is Britannia. → Does not follow → Since 'Some Cadbury are Britannia.' & 'No Nestle is Amul..' means that No Amul is Britannia.' only a possibility not necessary so the conclusion does not follows.

Hence, Only conclusions I and II follow.