Overview
Test Series
Analysis based on |
Editorial published in India-Pak rift on Indus Water Treaty: Neutral expert backs New Delhi’s stand The Indian Express on January 22nd, 2025 |
Topics for UPSC Prelims |
Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), Permanent Court of Arbitration, Hydroelectric projects in India, India-Pakistan relations |
Topics for UPSC Mains |
Role of hydropower in India’s energy strategy, Transboundary water management |
The Neutral Expert has recently ruled in favor of India on the Indus Waters Treaty. This judgment is a significant development for India, supporting its interpretation of the treaty. It marks a crucial win for New Delhi in its ongoing disputes with Pakistan over hydroelectric projects.
The Neutral Expert’s decision to deem himself competent to adjudicate the differences between India and Pakistan regarding the design of the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects confirms India’s long-held position. This effectively upholds India's rights under the IWT. It prevents premature escalation to the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). This judgment reiterates that the proper methods and procedures as envisioned for the resolution of international disputes should be complied with. In this respect, the judgment shall provide precedent for future disagreements to be managed in an orderly process.
Get UPSC Beginners Program SuperCoaching @ just
₹50000₹0
The Indus Waters Treaty was signed between the two nations, India and Pakistan on 19 September 1960. The World Bank was used as the facilitator of the process of mediation. Mediation was important because waters that flowed through the river Indus belonged to both the Indian and Pakistani nations. It played a very important part in their agrarian and industrial sectors. Indeed, the effort of IWT could be considered vital for cooperation efforts and equitable appropriation of water flow between the country.
India and Pakistan achieved independence status in 1947. Two years later, both nations confronted severe management challenges based on the shared Indus River basin. Apart from supporting hydroelectric power schemes, the river serves irrigation needs. It also provides direct water supply for consumption purposes in both nations. Diversion issues arise rather soon thereafter with conflicts on possible divergence looming. Considering the seriousness of the issue, the World Bank brokered the meeting between the two countries. After nine years of discussion, IWT was signed. It paved the way for the peaceful and equal division and control of waters.
Read the editorial on the Indus Water Treaty Renegotiation!
There are some principles that govern how the water runs in the river Indus because of IWT as follows:
Read the article on the Arbitration and Conciliation Act!
In case of disagreement between India and Pakistan about the interpretation or implementation of the IWT, there exists a comprehensive mechanism for its resolution between the two nations. The mechanism is three-tiered:
Read the article on the Alternative Dispute Resolution!
Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects, of which the current row has resulted, are run-of-the-river schemes located in Jammu and Kashmir state. These projects are designed to generate electricity. This should be done without significantly altering the natural flow of the river. Still, Pakistan had lodged some objections against design features of some of these plants that violate IWT. This Neutral Expert's decision thus confirms that those issues fall within his mandate. It enables him to review the technical objections and produce a decision.
Read the article on the International Court of Justice!
Several key steps toward this are laid down so that the successful working of IWT may not only be sustained but that future disputes must also be dealt with.
India-Pakistan RelationsIWT has constituted a vital aspect of the relations between India and Pakistan. It has provided a framework for cooperation. This is despite the larger relationship remaining political instead of purely and purely political. The decision made by the Neutral Expert demonstrates the strength and possibility of the treaty for both countries to peacefully settle their dispute over transboundary waters. However, sustainable efforts are required in trusting the treaty with continuous encouragement and compliance. Role of International Organizations in Mediating Transboundary Water DisputesInternational organizations, such as the World Bank, play a crucial role in the mediation of transboundary water disputes. They offer a neutral negotiation platform, appoint experts for dispute resolution, and provide financial and technical assistance. Their involvement can help:
The IWT judgment recently passed by the Neutral Expert calls for structured mechanisms and international mediation as means for complex transboundary water disputes. In other words, this sets precedent for future disputes while further reminding both India and Pakistan to coexist in constant cooperation and interaction toward equitable use of their shared waters with sustainability. |
Download the Testbook APP & Get Pass Pro Max FREE for 7 Days
Download the testbook app and unlock advanced analytics.