Which historian considered the gold coin of Jahangir called as Zodiac coin as fake ?

The correct answer is - G.H. Khare

Key Points

• Zodiac Coins of Jahangir
  • The Zodiac coins were specially minted gold coins during the reign of the Mughal Emperor Jahangir.
  • These coins are unique as they feature the zodiac signs, a departure from the usual Islamic calligraphy seen on Mughal coins.
  • The coins are considered an example of Jahangir's artistic and creative inclinations.
• G.H. Khare's Assertion
  • Historian G.H. Khare questioned the authenticity of these coins and regarded them as fake.
  • His view stems from debates among numismatists and historians about the coins' legitimacy, as some believed they were forged later and not issued during Jahangir's reign.
• Importance in History
  • The controversy surrounding the Zodiac coins reflects the complexity of evaluating historical artifacts and the role of historians like G.H. Khare in challenging established narratives.

Additional Information

• Jahangir's Contribution to Numismatics
  • Jahangir's reign (1605–1627) is notable for its advancements in the field of coinage.
  • He introduced coins with portraits and unique designs, showcasing his interest in art and culture.
  • The Zodiac coins are often seen as a reflection of his fascination with astrology and personal interests.
• Other Historians' Perspectives
  • Jadunath Sarkar and G.S. Sardesai did not question the authenticity of the Zodiac coins and accepted them as genuine.
  • S.N. Sen focused on broader aspects of Jahangir's administration and cultural contributions rather than delving into numismatic controversies.
• Legacy of Mughal Coins
  • Mughal coins are prized for their artistic beauty and historical significance.
  • They provide valuable insights into the economic and cultural history of the Mughal Empire.
  • The Zodiac coins, regardless of their authenticity, remain a topic of great interest among historians and collectors.