In legal discussions, rights are grouped to show what they cover and how they apply. There are two main types: Right in Rem and Right in Personam. Right in Rem refers to rights that apply to everyone, like property rights. Right in Personam involves rights and duties between specific individuals, like the terms in a contract. Understanding these types is important for knowing how legal rights and responsibilities work in different legal systems. Explore other important Judiciary Notes.

Right in Rem

A Right in Rem is a kind of right you can enforce against anyone in the world. It means that everyone has to recognize and respect your interest in a specific piece of property or whatever the subject is. The ownership of things and legal property claims relate to this particular type of right most frequently. Through this right you guarantee everyone will recognize your ownership claim or interest in the held property.

Characteristics of Right in Rem:

Some of the features of right in rem are as follows-

• Universality: Enforceable against all individuals. Like- if someone owns a piece of land this ownership is respected by everyone.
• Negative Right: It obliges everyone to refrain from interfering with the right holder’s property or rights.

Examples of Right in Rem:

Below are some examples of rights in rem:-

• Property Ownership: If person A owns a piece of land, their ownership right is a right in rem. This means person A can enforce this right against anyone who tries to encroach on or use their land without permission. 
• Vehicle Ownership: Ownership of a car is a right in rem, as it is enforceable against anyone who attempts to use or damage the vehicle without the owner's consent.
• Intellectual Property: A patent holder has a right in rem, as they can prevent anyone from using their patented invention without permission.
• Trademark Rights: The owner of a registered trademark has a right in rem to prevent others from using a confusingly similar mark.

Copyrights: An author’s exclusive rights to their literary works are rights in rem, enforceable against the entire world.

A Right in Personam is a personal right that you can assert against a specific person or group of people. This kind of right commonly comes from a contract where someone has made promises to you. It means you have the authority to make sure they do what they said they would do, or to stop them if they try to do something they shouldn't. Essentially, it's a way to ensure that the obligations agreed upon in the contract are upheld by the person or group involved.

Characteristics of Right in Personam:

Some of the features of right in personam are as follows-

• Specificity: Enforceable against a particular person or entity. For example, a contractual obligation between two parties.
• Positive Right: It requires the obligated party to perform a specific act or fulfill a duty.

Examples of Right in Personam:

Some of the illustrations of right in personam are as follows-

• Contractual Obligations: The right to receive payment worth 25 lakhs from B regarding his house purchase gives A a Right in Personam. The right created by this agreement can only be enforced against B.
• Lease Agreements: If B rents his farmhouse to C for Rs. 5000 per month, B’s right to collect rent from C is a Right in Personam, enforceable specifically against C.
• Loan Agreements: A lender’s right to receive repayment from a borrower is a Right in Personam.
• Service Contracts: An agreement between an employer and employee establishes rights in personam regarding job duties and compensation.
• Settlement Agreements: Rights arising from a legal settlement are enforceable against the specific parties involved.

Case Laws of Right in Rem and Right in Personam

Cases help illustrate how courts apply the Right in Rem and Right in Personam. The following are some of the landmark judgments related to this. Some landmark cases include:

R Viswanathan vs Syed Abdul Wajid: 

Jus in Rem received recognition as a right which operates against every person in the world. According to the court a Right in Rem requires all people to acknowledge the right through essential duties.

MV Elisabeth vs Harwan Investment:

The defendant becomes fully responsible for the entire amount of valid claims proved by the plaintiff during an admiralty suit in personam. It highlighted the personal nature of Right in Personam and its enforceability against specific individuals.

Pennoyer v. Neff (1878): 

The U.S. Supreme Court explained in this decision what in personam and in rem jurisdiction means by stressing the need for process service within the state boundaries to establish personal jurisdiction. 

Harris v. Balk (1905): 

The Court held that a debt follows the debtor, allowing for quasi in rem jurisdiction by attaching the debtor's obligations, thus affecting rights in personam. 

Shaffer v. Heitner (1977):

 The Supreme Court ruled that the mere ownership of property in a state is not a sufficient contact to subject the property owner to a lawsuit in that state, unless that property is the subject of the lawsuit, refining the understanding of rights in rem and in personam.

Understanding the difference between Right in Rem and Right in Personam is very important in legal studies. These terms determine how rights are enforced and who they are enforced against. Rights in Rem are universal, which means they protect a person's interests against everyone else. They mainly help stop others from interfering with someone’s property or rights. For example, ownership of a piece of land means others cannot use or damage it without permission. In contrast,Personam rights exist solely for particular individuals or groups they represent. Agreements such as contracts serve as the source for most rights. A personal contractual obligation emerges when you agree to pay someone money through contract signing. Legal rules become clearer when we understand these distinctions while the proper enforcement of laws depends on understanding these differences.

Download Key take aways of Right in Rem and Right in Personam