Family Law MCQ Quiz in தமிழ் - Objective Question with Answer for Family Law - இலவச PDF ஐப் பதிவிறக்கவும்
Last updated on Mar 22, 2025
Latest Family Law MCQ Objective Questions
Top Family Law MCQ Objective Questions
Family Law Question 1:
What conditions must be met for an adoption to be valid under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 1 Detailed Solution
Correct Answer: 4) All of the above Explanation: According to Section 6 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, for an adoption to be valid, certain conditions must be met, including the legal right of the adopter to adopt, the legal ability of the giver to give the child in adoption, and the lawful placement of the child for adoption, among other specific conditions outlined in the Act.
Family Law Question 2:
Under the Hindu Marriage Act,1955, which of the following is NOT a condition for a Hindu marriage?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 2 Detailed Solution
Correct Answer: 4) The bride and groom must have completed 30 years of age.
Explanation: Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, outlines various conditions for a Hindu marriage, including valid consent, minimum age, and not being within prohibited degrees of relationship. There is no requirement in the Act for either party to have completed 30 years of age, making option D incorrect.
Family Law Question 3:
A Hindu male having a Hindu wife, changed his religion and adopts Islam in 2012. He marries again to a Muslim girl in 2013. In 2014, his Hindu wife died. His second marriage is:
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 3 Detailed Solution
Correct Option: Void as his second marriage amounts to bigamy
Key Points
Under Indian law, specifically the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, bigamy is illegal for Hindus. A Hindu male converting to Islam and marrying again without legally dissolving his first marriage is committing bigamy. The law does not recognize the second marriage as valid if the first marriage is still in existence, regardless of the change in religion.
Incorrect Options:
Valid as he married after conversion to Islam which permits bigamy: This option is incorrect because, despite his conversion to Islam, the Indian legal framework does not allow a person to escape obligations and laws applicable to their original religion by simply changing their religion. The act of bigamy is evaluated based on the fact that he was already married under the Hindu law, which continues to hold him accountable.
Valid as his wife died after his marriage to Muslim girl: This option is incorrect because the validity of the second marriage is determined at the time it was conducted, not by subsequent events. At the time of his second marriage, his first wife was still alive, and he had not legally dissolved his first marriage, making the second marriage invalid.
Void as he has not taken the consent of his Hindu wife: While it's true that the consent of the first wife could be a moral or ethical consideration, the legal issue at hand is the act of bigamy itself. The absence of the first wife's consent is not the primary legal reason for the second marriage being void; rather, it is the existence of the first marriage that invalidates the second one.
Family Law Question 4:
With respect to'; Daughters' under 'class I heirs' in the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which one the following holds true?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 4 Detailed Solution
Hint
Correct Answer: Daughter includes posthumous daughter.
Explanation: Under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a posthumous daughter (a daughter born after the death of her father) is considered a Class I heir, just like a daughter born during the lifetime of the father. This ensures that the rights of inheritance are not denied to a daughter simply because she was not born before her father's death.
Incorrect Options:
- Natural born daughters and not adopted daughters: This statement is incorrect because, according to the Hindu Succession Act, both natural and adopted daughters have equal rights to inherit the property of their parents. The Act does not discriminate between natural and adopted daughters in matters of inheritance.
- Stepdaughter is included: This is not accurate in the context of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Stepdaughters do not have the same rights to inheritance as natural or adopted daughters under this Act. The Act specifically pertains to the biological or legally adopted children of the deceased.
- Unchastity of daughter is a bar to inheritance: This statement is outdated and incorrect. The Hindu Succession Act does not consider the chastity of a daughter as a criterion for her eligibility to inherit property. The Act ensures equal inheritance rights to daughters, irrespective of their marital status or personal life choices.
Family Law Question 5:
Section 11 of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, provides for?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 5 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is Void Marriages.
Key Points
- Section 11 of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, provides for Void marriages.
- It states that —Any marriage solemnised after the commencement of this Act shall be null and void and may, on a petition presented by either party thereto against the other party, be so declared by a decree of nullity if it contravenes any one of the conditions specified in clauses (i), (iv) and (v) of section 5.
Family Law Question 6:
Which of the following are true with regard to the desertion of spouse under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?
A. Factum of Separation
B. Animus deserendi
C. Prescribed period of 2 years must have passed before presentation of petition
D. With reasonable cause
E. Without the consent of the petitioner
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 6 Detailed Solution
Key Points
Factum of Separation (A): This refers to the actual physical separation between the spouses. It is a necessary condition for desertion, as it establishes that the spouses are living apart. Hence, Statement A is correct.
Animus Deserendi (B): This Latin term translates to the intention to desert, which is a crucial component of desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It implies that one spouse has the intention to permanently end the cohabitation with the other spouse without any reasonable cause and without the consent of the other spouse. Hence, Statement B is correct.
Prescribed period of 2 years must have passed before presentation of petition (C): According to the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for a petition of divorce to be filed on the grounds of desertion, the desertion must have continued for at least two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. Therefore, Statement C is correct.
With reasonable cause (D): This statement is not accurate in the context of desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Desertion implies the absence of reasonable cause. The spouse leaving the matrimonial home does so without any justified reason and without the consent of the other spouse. Hence, Statement D is incorrect.
Without the consent of the petitioner (E): For an act to qualify as desertion, it must be without the consent of the other spouse (the petitioner in the divorce case). If the separation occurs with mutual consent, it cannot be considered desertion under the law. Hence, Statement E is correct.
Given the above explanations:
- Statement A (Factum of Separation) is correct because it is a requirement for desertion.
- Statement B (Animus Deserendi) is correct as it highlights the intention behind the separation.
- Statement C (Prescribed period of 2 years must have passed before presentation of petition) is correct, aligning with the legal requirement under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
- Statement D (With reasonable cause) is incorrect as desertion implies leaving without a reasonable cause.
- Statement E (Without the consent of the petitioner) is correct, emphasizing the non-consensual aspect of desertion.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 3 (A, B, C, and E only).
Family Law Question 7:
The children born out of a void Hindu marriage, are in the eyes of law
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 7 Detailed Solution
Key Points
Correct Explanation for Option 4:
Children born out of a void Hindu marriage are considered legitimate but their right of inheritance is limited only to the property of their parents. This is in accordance with the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which aims to provide protection and rights to children born from such marriages.
This provision ensures that children have financial security and a claim to their parent's property, even though the marriage itself may not be legally recognized. It is a significant aspect of family law that seeks to safeguard the interests of children.
Overview of Incorrect Options:
Option 1 (Illegitimate): Incorrect because, under the Hindu Marriage Act, children born from a void marriage are not considered illegitimate. The law provides them with certain rights, including the right to inherit their parent's property.
Option 2 (Legitimate): This option is partially correct in stating that the children are legitimate. However, it does not specify that their inheritance rights are limited to their parent's property, which is a crucial aspect of their legal status.
Option 3 (Illegitimate, having no rights in the ancestral property): This option is incorrect as it denies the children any inheritance rights. While their rights are limited, they are not entirely absent. They do have rights to their parent's property, contradicting the implication of this option.
In summary, the law recognizes the legitimacy of children born out of void Hindu marriages but specifically limits their inheritance rights to their parent's property, ensuring they have a legal claim to support and protection without extending these rights to ancestral property.
Family Law Question 8:
When an unmarried woman adopts a child and subsequently marries; the person who she subsequently marries, shall be the:
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 8 Detailed Solution
Key Points
Correct Answer: Stepfather of the child
Explanation: When an unmarried woman adopts a child and later marries, the man she marries does not automatically become the adoptive father of the child. Instead, he is considered the stepfather because he has not legally adopted the child himself. The relationship is established through marriage to the child's legal parent (the adoptive mother), not through a legal process of adoption.
Family Law Question 9:
Under Muslim Law, marriage with a woman, whose husband is alive, is:
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 9 Detailed Solution
The correct option is ' Void'.
Key Points
- Under Muslim law, marriage is not only a contract but also a sacred covenant.
- It has its own set of rules and stipulations that are to be strictly followed to ensure the legality of the marriage under Islamic jurisprudence.
- One of the fundamental rules in Muslim law is that a woman cannot be married to another man while her current husband is still alive and they are legally married.
- This rule is in place to protect the sanctity of marriage and to prevent polyandry, which is not permitted in Islam.
- Therefore, a marriage with a woman whose husband is alive and to whom she is still legally married is considered void under Muslim law.
- This means that the marriage is invalid from the outset, and no legal rights or obligations arise from it.
Additional Information
- Void marriages in Muslim law are those that do not meet the essential requirements of a valid marriage contract. These requirements include the consent of both parties, absence of legal disability, and observance of the proper form of marriage.
- Such marriages do not produce any civil rights or obligations between the parties and are treated as if they never occurred.
Family Law Question 10:
Which of the following statement's is/are correct?
A. Dower is a consideration for the surrender of person by the wife.
B. Dower is the technical Anglo-Mohammedan term for its equivalent 'Mahr' in Arabic.
C. Dower must be fixed at the marriage ceremony otherwise marriage will be void.
D. Where no dower is expressly fixed at the marriage ceremony, the law confers the right of dower upon wife.
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Family Law Question 10 Detailed Solution
In Islamic law, dower (or Mahr) is seen as a form of consideration given to the bride in exchange for her agreement to marry and, by extension, surrender her person to the husband. It's a mandatory payment, in either money or possessions paid or promised to be paid by the groom, or by groom's father, to the bride at the time of marriage, that legally becomes her property.
Hence, Statement A is correct.
Statement B: Dower is the technical Anglo-Mohammedan term for its equivalent 'Mahr' in Arabic.
The term 'Dower' is used in the context of Anglo-Mohammedan law, which refers to the legal systems that applied in British India to Muslims in matters of personal law. 'Mahr' is the Arabic term for the same concept, and 'Dower' is essentially its English equivalent used within the context of Anglo-Mohammedan legal discourse.
Hence, Statement B is correct.
Statement C: Dower must be fixed at the marriage ceremony otherwise marriage will be void.
While it is traditional and customary to fix the dower at the time of the marriage ceremony, Islamic law does not mandate that the marriage would be void if the dower is not fixed at that time. The essential components of a valid Islamic marriage are the consent of the parties, presence of witnesses, and the offer and acceptance. The fixing of the dower can be agreed upon at any time before or after the marriage ceremony.
Hence, Statement C is incorrect.
Statement D: Where no dower is expressly fixed at the marriage ceremony, the law confers the right of dower upon wife.
In cases where no specific amount of dower is fixed at the time of marriage, Islamic law ensures the wife's right to a dower. The amount, in such cases, would be determined based on various factors such as the social status of the parties, customary amounts within the community, and other relevant considerations. The wife is entitled to a 'proper dower' (Mahr al-mithl) which is equitable and in line with what women of her social standing typically receive.
Hence, Statement D is correct.
In conclusion, the correct answer is option 2 (A, B and D only), as Statements A, B, and D are correct while Statement C is incorrect.